Sustainable procurement practices good for business and society

This is one of many conclusions drawn by supply chain specialists speaking at the BSR conference in New York last week.
By Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
November 10, 2010 - SCMR Editorial

Company sustainability ratings are proliferating as the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) agenda steadily migrates from the margins to the mainstream of capital, procurement, and consumer markets. This is one of many conclusions drawn by supply chain specialists speaking at the BSR conference in New York last week.

“While the advance of sustainability ratings has spawned innovation, questions of rigor, consistency, transparency, and independence appear with increasing frequency, fueled in part by the financial and environmental crises in the last few years,” said Allen White, vice president and senior fellow, Tellus Institute.

As moderator of the panel, “Sustainability Ratings: Time for a Common Framework,” he noted that these developments lead to one key question.

“How can we use ratings to drive continuously higher levels of sustainability performance among companies worldwide?” he asked.

Marcela Manubens, senior vice president, global human rights a social responsibility program, Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, observed that “critical mass” is still an objective.

“There’s been a convergence of social agendas,” she said, “but there remains a need for a closer relationship with consumer practice and corporate behavior. Clearly, we are not there yet.”

Steven Lydenberg, chief investment officer, Domini Social Investments, agreed, but the “competitive culture” of corporations was still an obstacle.

“I’m a great believer in KPIs (Key Performance Indicators),” he said. Right now, there are too many secondary indicators on the societal front, with too many scores. That gives us a false sense of completion, and fails to quantify findings.”

As a consequence, he added, corporations are discouraged from innovating.

Michael Marx, executive director, corporate ethics international, said that no matter how slow the process has been so far, corporations must become more transparent.

“Otherwise,” he said, “they run the risk of having procurement negatively impacted. NGOs, for example, can redirect capital if they can’t see beyond the ‘black box’ some corporations still use in their supply chains.”

Indeed, he said, a movement perspective on ratings will educate consumers and differentiate providers.

“That’s when the interests of NGOs and corporations dovetail, and create a win-win,” said Marx.



About the Author

image
Patrick Burnson
Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

The questions for the most recent Semiannual Economic Forecast, which was released last week, included: 1-has the strength of the U.S. dollar had a negative, negligible or positive impact on their organization’s profits?; 2-has the net impact of the depressed prices of oil and related commodities been negative, negligible, or positive for their organization’s profits; and 3-how would they characterize the combined impact of their organization’s profits on the strength of the U.S. dollar and the depressed prices of oil and related commodities.

The Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) reported this week that that U.S. trade with its North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) partners Canada and Mexico dropped 5.8 percent on an annual basis in March to $90.5 billion.

Shippers sourcing their goods out the Port of Oakland’s largest marine terminal will soon need to make an appointment drayage providers before their cargo is released.

U.S. Carloads fell 10.6 percent at 244,290, and intermodal containers and trailers were off 6.5 percent at 262,693.

Now that the deal, which had to clear several regulatory hurdles in multiple countries, is official, FedEx executives were able to speak a little bit more freely, albeit being somewhat guarded in regards to certain integration specifics at the same time.

About the Author

Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at [email protected]

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.