Sustainable procurement practices good for business and society

This is one of many conclusions drawn by supply chain specialists speaking at the BSR conference in New York last week.
By Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
November 10, 2010 - SCMR Editorial

Company sustainability ratings are proliferating as the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) agenda steadily migrates from the margins to the mainstream of capital, procurement, and consumer markets. This is one of many conclusions drawn by supply chain specialists speaking at the BSR conference in New York last week.

“While the advance of sustainability ratings has spawned innovation, questions of rigor, consistency, transparency, and independence appear with increasing frequency, fueled in part by the financial and environmental crises in the last few years,” said Allen White, vice president and senior fellow, Tellus Institute.

As moderator of the panel, “Sustainability Ratings: Time for a Common Framework,” he noted that these developments lead to one key question.

“How can we use ratings to drive continuously higher levels of sustainability performance among companies worldwide?” he asked.

Marcela Manubens, senior vice president, global human rights a social responsibility program, Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, observed that “critical mass” is still an objective.

“There’s been a convergence of social agendas,” she said, “but there remains a need for a closer relationship with consumer practice and corporate behavior. Clearly, we are not there yet.”

Steven Lydenberg, chief investment officer, Domini Social Investments, agreed, but the “competitive culture” of corporations was still an obstacle.

“I’m a great believer in KPIs (Key Performance Indicators),” he said. Right now, there are too many secondary indicators on the societal front, with too many scores. That gives us a false sense of completion, and fails to quantify findings.”

As a consequence, he added, corporations are discouraged from innovating.

Michael Marx, executive director, corporate ethics international, said that no matter how slow the process has been so far, corporations must become more transparent.

“Otherwise,” he said, “they run the risk of having procurement negatively impacted. NGOs, for example, can redirect capital if they can’t see beyond the ‘black box’ some corporations still use in their supply chains.”

Indeed, he said, a movement perspective on ratings will educate consumers and differentiate providers.

“That’s when the interests of NGOs and corporations dovetail, and create a win-win,” said Marx.



About the Author

image
Patrick Burnson
Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

Seasonally-adjusted (SA) for-hire truck tonnage in July headed up 1.3 percent on the heels of a 0.8 percent increase in June. The ATA’s not seasonally-adjusted (NSA) index, which represents the change in tonnage actually hauled by fleets before any seasonal adjustment, was 133.3 in July, which outpaced June’s 132.3 by 0.8 percent, and was up 2.8 percent annually.

Volumes for the month of July at the Port of Long Beach (POLB) and the Port of Los Angeles (POLA) were mixed, according to data recently issued by the ports. Unlike May and June, which saw higher than usual seasonal volumes, due to the West Coast port labor situation, July was down as retailers had completed filling inventories for back-to-school shopping.

With a 0.8 cent decrease, this week’s average price per gallon is $3.835 and stands as the lowest price since hitting $3.844 the week of November 25, 2013.

LTL carriers are rapidly investing in expensive, on-dock, three-dimensional size measurement capturing machinery, and they are hoping one day of being able to more accurately charge shippers rates based on the actual dimensions of their shipments, rather than the traditional weight-and-distance-based formula that has been in effect since the 1930s or even earlier.

The Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) recently reported that its Freight Transportation Services Index (TSI) dipped 0.9 percent from May to June.

About the Author

Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review. Patrick covers international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. Contact Patrick Burnson

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.