CSX reports strong second quarter earnings

Class I railroad carrier CSX today reported second quarter net earnings of $535 million and $0.52 per share, which was up four percent annually and beat Wall Street estimates of $0.47 per share.

By ·

Class I railroad carrier CSX today reported second quarter net earnings of $535 million and $0.52 per share, which was up four percent annually and beat Wall Street estimates of $0.47 per share.

Quarterly operating income at $963 million was up 2 percent, and quarterly revenue at roughly $3.1 billion was up 2 percent. Company officials said that the strong quarterly output, which provided record results in all of its key financial measures, was driven by overall revenue growth, service and efficiency results, among other factors.

Total second quarter volume for the Jacksonville, Fla.-based railroad carrier was 1.656 million total units, representing a 1 percent annual gain. Intermodal was up 2 percent at 644,000 units, and chemical and automotive loadings at 133,000 and 113,000 were up 11 and 2 percent, respectively. Coal was down 6 percent at 310,000. Total merchandise was up 3 percent at 702,000 units.

“On the revenue side, we were encouraged by the solid growth across many of our markets, offsetting the ongoing challenges in coal,” said Michael Ward, CSX President and CEO, on an earnings call earlier today. “Overall revenue was up slightly on a 1 percent volume growth combined with the team’s ability to drive solid core pricing for the service value CSX is providing. At the same time, we continue to deliver consistently high performances in safety, service, and efficiency in the pace of a broad range of economic and market conditions that continue to be dynamic.”

Looking at pricing for the quarter, Clarence Gooden, CSX executive vice president, sales and marketing, said on the call that core pricing on a same-store sales basis remained solid across nearly all markets, with these shipments representing nearly 80 percent of CSX’s traffic base for the quarter.
CSX defines same-store the same-store sales as shipments with the same customer, commodity and car type, and the same origin and destination.

Quarterly pricing increased 2.3 percent annually and 4.1 percent when excluding export coal, said Gooden. Revenue per unit averaged $1,863.

“On either basis, pricing exceeded rail inflation, which was low this quarter,” said Gooden. “A strong service product provides a solid foundation for pricing above rail inflation, which supports reinvestment over the long-term. We are confident in the value of our service product to remain focused on driving profitable growth.”


About the Author

Jeff Berman, Group News Editor
Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis. Contact Jeff Berman

Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine!

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Article Topics

CSX · Intermodal · Railroad · All Topics
Latest Whitepaper
How Lean is your Lean Quality Program?
Avoid quality program bureaucracy that can sap logistics productivity and increase costs
Download Today!
Hub Group Resources
Not Your Grandfather's Intermodal Transportation of freight in containers was first recorded around 1780 to move coal along England’s Bridgewater Canal. However, "modern" intermodal rail service by a major U.S. railroad only dates back to 1936. Malcom McLean’s Sea-Land Service significantly advanced intermodalism, showing how freight could be loaded into a “container” and moved by two or more modes economically and conveniently. As with all new technologies, there were problems that slowed the growth, which influenced many potential customers to shy away from moving intermodal.
Click Here to Download.
From the September 2016 Issue
Indecision revolving around three complex supply chain elements—transportation, technology and organizational structure—finds many companies waiting to commit to a strategic path. However, waiting too long will only result in a competitive disadvantage that will be difficult to overcome in today’s fast-paced, global economy.
Time for Asia’s ports to rebuild
Is the freight recession upon us…again?
View More From this Issue
Subscribe to Our Email Newsletter
Sign up today to receive our FREE, weekly email newsletter!
Latest Webcast
Supply Chain Best Practices: Visibility to In-Transit Inventory
During this webcast you'll learn on how various organizations have gained instant access to in-transit parcels and given access to this information to stakeholders.
Register Today!
EDITORS' PICKS
25th Annual Masters of Logistics
Indecision revolving around three complex supply chain elements—transportation, technology and...
2016 Quest for Quality: Winners Take the Spotlight
Which carriers, third-party logistics providers and U.S. ports have crossed the service-excellence...

Regional ports concentrate on growth and connectivity
With the Panama Canal expansion complete, ocean cargo gateways in the Caribbean are investing to...
Digital Reality Check
Just how close are we to the ideal digital supply network? Not as close as we might like to think....