Subscribe to our free, weekly email newsletter!



One more thing about the winter

By Jeff Berman, Group News Editor
May 23, 2014

OK, so this past winter was brutal. That may go down as the understatement of the year. We have written about it a bunch on this site and in print––and for good reason.

The impact the winter had on freight transportation and logistics operations is well-documented, too, what with making it harder for shippers to secure capacity, especially over the road, as well as railroad-related service issues, among other issues.

But when it comes to how the harsh winter weather impacted manufacturing and non-manufacturing operations, it was not nearly as dire as it was for freight transportation and logistics, according to the Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) Spring 2014 Semiannual Economic Forecast that was issued earlier this month.

In each ISM Semiannual Economic Forecast, a “special question” is included for both its manufacturing and non-manufacturing member respondents. The Spring 2014 question was along the lines of whether or not there was an impact on their businesses (specifically new orders, production, and employment for manufacturing and new orders business activity, and employment for non-manufacturing) and, if so, whether those impacts were short-term (to be made up in the balance of 2014) or long-term (impact having a lasting effect on the whole year).

Looking at the feedback for this question in the report, I initially expected a much different response than what the data indicated.

For manufacturing, on the new orders side, 51.3 percent of the panel said there was no impact, with 34.2 percent citing a short-term impact, 6 percent long-term, and 8.5 percent unsure. The report added that for manufacturing production, 52.8 percent of respondents indicated no impact, 34.2 percent indicated that the impact was short-term, 7.5 percent indicated that the impact was long-term, and 5.5 percent were unsure of the extent of the impact. And for employment, 78.5 percent of respondents indicated no impact, 12.5 percent indicated that the impact was short-term, 3 percent indicated that the impact was long-term, and 6 percent were unsure of the extent of the impact.

As for non-manufacturing, for new orders, 58 percent of respondents indicated no impact, 26.4 percent indicated that the impact was short-term, 6.3 percent indicated that the impact was long-term, and 9.2 percent were unsure of the extent of the impact. For Business Activity, 57.1 percent of respondents indicated no impact, 32.6 percent indicated that the impact was short-term, 5.7 percent indicated that the impact was long-term, and 4.6 percent were unsure of the extent of the impact. Finally, for Employment, 81.7 percent of respondents indicated no impact, 9.7 percent indicated that the impact was short-term, 2.3 percent indicated that the impact was long-term, and 6.3 percent were unsure of the extent of the impact.

So, looking at that feedback, the general consensus could be something like: “take that, winter!” Grin. As I previously mentioned, I mistakenly assumed that the impact would be far more severe. In my own defense, living through this past winter in Maine was not a cause for celebration (summer is a different story fortunately!).

Brad Holcomb, chair of the ISM Manufacturing Survey Business Committee, told me that he anecdotally heard about 40 percent of publicly traded companies pointed to weather as a drag on their first quarter earnings reports, which saw pundits labeling bad weather as an “excuse” for poor performance.

“We saw with the data that the winter’s impact was not that severe,” he said. “It was difficult, of course, but it is over now and companies are back on track.”

Tony Nieves, chair of the ISM’s Non-Manufacturing Business Survey Committee, agreed with Holcomb, explaining that while the weather had some impact in the first two months of the year, once there was a break in the weather things got back to business as usual.

“It was definitely a speed bump but not a crash,” he said.

The fact that Old Man winter did not beat down overall throughput for ISM members is a good thing. Even with some of the challenges it presented for nearly everyone, they were able to work through it and persevere, which is a good thing. Will things be as smooth the next time winter rears its ugly head? Only time will tell.

About the Author

Jeff Berman headshot
Jeff Berman
Group News Editor

Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis. .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

The Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) August edition of the Manufacturing Report on Business saw its PMI, the ISM’s index to measure growth, fall 1.6 percent to 51.1, following a 0.8 percent decline to 52.7 in July. Even with the relatively slow growth over the last two months, the PI has been at 50 or higher for 31 consecutive months.

Hackett observed in the new report that China’s economy has lost steam, with actual growth falling short of targeted rates, while the United States most recent second quarter GDP reading at 3.7 percent outpaced expected targets, even though it was negatively impacted by gains in manufacturing and retail inventories.

The proposed merger of Cosco and CSCL could spark further container consolidation

The average price dropped 4.7 cents to $2.514 per gallon, which now stands at the lowest weekly average price for diesel since July 2009, when it was at $2.542 the week of July 27, 2009, according to EIA data.

The Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) reported this week that U.S. trade with its North America Free Trade Agreement partners Canada and Mexico in June dropped 3.8 percent annually to $99.0 billion. This followed a 10.8 percent decline in May to $92.7 billion.

Article Topics

Blogs · ISM · All topics

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2015 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA