Subscribe to our free, weekly email newsletter!


Proposed FY 2014 White House budget calls for 5.5 percent increase in DOT funding

By Jeff Berman, Group News Editor
April 11, 2013

While specific funding mechanisms for transportation infrastructure-related efforts remain murky, proposed funding for the Department of Transportation (DOT) in the White House’s proposed fiscal year 2014 budget is heading up.

The budget, which was released Tuesday, April 10, is calling for a total of $76.6 billion in discretionary and mandatory budget resources for the DOT, representing a 5.5 percent increase—or $4 billion—above the 2012, enacted level, according to the White House.

Key DOT-related components of the proposed budget include:
-an additional $50 million in immediate investments in 2014 to support critical infrastructure projects, improving America’s roads, bridges, transit systems, border crossings, railways, and runways, including $40 billion in “Fix-it-First” investments for improving existing infrastructure assets and $10 billion to spur state and local innovation in infrastructure development;
-a five-year, $40 billion rail reauthorization program to improve existing intercity passenger rail services, develop new high speed rail corridors and strengthen the economic competitiveness of our new freight rail system;
-fully fund the authorized funding levels provided in the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) for surface transportation programs; and
-reserve funding after MAP-21’s expiration in 2015 for robust, long-term reauthorization of surface transportation programs, including a 25 percent increase from current funding levels, among others.

The budget said that this spending level pays for the rail and surface transportation proposals with “savings from ramping down overseas military operations,” adding that because rebuilding the Nation’s infrastructure is an immediate need, the budget uses near-term savings from reduced overseas operations to fully offset the long-term reauthorization proposals. These savings would offset baseline Highway Trust Fund solvency needs, the out-year surface transportation reauthorization allowance and the rail reauthorization proposal.

While this proposed DOT budget is ambitious on various fronts, funding still remains an issue and the White House is laying out a plan for a national transportation program in the context that funding increases for surface transportation do not increase the deficit, according to Mort Downey, Coalitions for America’s Gateways and Trade Corridors (CAGTC) Chairman former deputy Transportation Secretary under President Bill Clinton.

“Republicans in Congress want to know where are the transportation-related taxes to pay for it are coming from,” Downey told LM. “It would be good if they commit to spend the money committed to transportation if it was raised, but it cannot be guaranteed. There is still the question of will this go anywhere or will it fall through the cracks due to the heavy partisanship that exists? At least there are some good arguments out there.”

Regardless of the potential outcome, Downey said that overall transportation policy in the last two years has taken better shape from an improving public works perspective than it previously has.

The proposed DOT budget was blasted by the American Trucking Associations (ATA), whom said that it fails to provide adequate detail and direction for how the country should pay for its infrastructure needs.

“The backbone of our economy is the asphalt, steel and concrete of our roads and bridges,” ATA President and CEO Bill Graves said in a statement, adding that “proposals to fund those roads should be equally concrete. For five years, we’ve waited for President Obama to clearly state how we should pay for these critical needs and, I’m sad to say, we continue to get lip service about the importance of roads and bridges with no real roadmap to real funding solutions.”

About the Author

Jeff Berman headshot
Jeff Berman
Group News Editor

Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis. .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

Not surprisingly, the December 31, 2015 deadline for freight railroads to install Positive Train Control (PTC) technology on 40 percent of its network, as per a mandate from the Federal Railroad Administration will not be met. That was the chief takeaway of a report from the Association of American Railroads.

When the Warehousing Education and Research Council (WERC) convenes for its annual conference in Chicago next week, they’ll be visiting the nation’s largest inland port.

The newly created and expanded alliances of P3 and G6 will certainly review and revise port calls, but the shift in initial deployments will be subtle, says Neil Davidson, senior analyst of ports and terminals for Drewry Research.

“U.S. Port Update: Investing in the Future” will feature a panel of three industry leaders from the East Coast, Gulf, and West Coast discussing their relative challenges and opportunities.

Zebra gains instant access to complimentary technologies. But first, it needs to integrate a former partner that is 2-1/2 times its size.

Article Topics

News · All topics

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2013 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA