Rail volumes remain mixed for week ending May 19, says AAR

Carload volume—at 280,565—was down 5 percent annually. Intermodal volumes—at 241,664 trailers and containers—were up 3.1 percent .

By ·

Rail carload and intermodal volumes were again mixed for the week ending May 19, according to data from the Association of American Railroads (AAR).

Carload volume—at 280,565—was down 5 percent annually and ahead of the week ending May 12 at 279,063 and also ahead of the week ending May 5 at 276,136.
Eastern carloads were down 4.5 percent annually, and out west carloads were down 5.3 percent.

Intermodal volumes—at 241,664 trailers and containers—were up 3.1 percent and ahead of the week ending May 12 at 238,980 and the week ending May 5 at 239,031.

Of the 20 commodity groups tracked by the AAR, 12 were up annually. Petroleum products were up 49.4 percent, and motor vehicles and equipment were up 23.3 percent.
Coal was down 16.1 percent.

Carloads for the first 20 weeks of 2012—at 5,627,959—were down 3.4 percent compared to the first 20 weeks of 2011, and intermodal was up 2.8 percent at 4,595,071 trailers and containers.

Estimated ton-miles for the week at 32.1 billion were down 3.9 percent, and for the year-to-date it is down 2.5 percent at 640.7 billion.


Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine!

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Article Topics

AAR · Intermodal · Rail Freight · All Topics
Latest Whitepaper
How Lean is your Lean Quality Program?
Avoid quality program bureaucracy that can sap logistics productivity and increase costs
Download Today!
Hub Group Resources
Not Your Grandfather's Intermodal Transportation of freight in containers was first recorded around 1780 to move coal along England’s Bridgewater Canal. However, "modern" intermodal rail service by a major U.S. railroad only dates back to 1936. Malcom McLean’s Sea-Land Service significantly advanced intermodalism, showing how freight could be loaded into a “container” and moved by two or more modes economically and conveniently. As with all new technologies, there were problems that slowed the growth, which influenced many potential customers to shy away from moving intermodal.
Click Here to Download.
From the September 2016 Issue
Indecision revolving around three complex supply chain elements—transportation, technology and organizational structure—finds many companies waiting to commit to a strategic path. However, waiting too long will only result in a competitive disadvantage that will be difficult to overcome in today’s fast-paced, global economy.
Time for Asia’s ports to rebuild
Is the freight recession upon us…again?
View More From this Issue
Subscribe to Our Email Newsletter
Sign up today to receive our FREE, weekly email newsletter!
Latest Webcast
Supply Chain Best Practices: Visibility to In-Transit Inventory
During this webcast you'll learn on how various organizations have gained instant access to in-transit parcels and given access to this information to stakeholders.
Register Today!
EDITORS' PICKS
25th Annual Masters of Logistics
Indecision revolving around three complex supply chain elements—transportation, technology and...
2016 Quest for Quality: Winners Take the Spotlight
Which carriers, third-party logistics providers and U.S. ports have crossed the service-excellence...

Regional ports concentrate on growth and connectivity
With the Panama Canal expansion complete, ocean cargo gateways in the Caribbean are investing to...
Digital Reality Check
Just how close are we to the ideal digital supply network? Not as close as we might like to think....