Subscribe to our free, weekly email newsletter!


Senators focused on increasing rail capacity expansion through an investment tax credit

By Jeff Berman, Group News Editor
August 09, 2010

Legislation introduced last week by Senators Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) and John Ensign (R-Nev.) is focused on putting more investment towards improving and increasing railroad infrastructure and capacity.

The objective of the bill, entitled the Freight Rail Infrastructure Capacity Expansion Act of 2010, is to encourage private capital investments that can benefit the general public through expanded rail network capacity. This is a companion bill to one introduced in 2009 by Congressman Kendrick Meek (D-Fla.).

Legislation designed to expand rail network capacity is not new, as it has been introduced several times in past years. But the case for expansion is not to be easily overlooked, given the number of reports put out that cite a true need for expanding capacity to meet future needs, including:
-a 2006 report from the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) that said by 2020 the rail system will carry an additional 888 million tons, for a 44 percent increase;
-a 2010 AASHTO report that said U.S. rail traffic will increase by 38 percent in 2040;
-a 2008 estimate by the Department of Transportation that demand for rail freight transportation measured in tonnage will increase 80 percent by 2035; and
-a projected $39 billion shortfall in required investment between 2007 and 2035 for Class I railroads to maintain current infrastructure efforts, according to the landmark 2008 National Rail Freight Infrastructure Capacity and Investment Study, which was commissioned by the DOT’s Railroad Energy Transportation Advisory CommitteeRailroad Committee and conducted by Cambridge Systematics.

Included in this bill are two tax incentives for increased private investment to expand freight rail infrastructure capacity. One being a 25 percent tax credit for capacity expansion expenditures on new freight infrastructure, and the other is the ability to expense all qualifying rail infrastructure capital expenditures that would spur the availability of capital necessary to expand capacity.

Previous versions of this legislation have indicated that the Freight Rail Infrastructure Capacity Expansion Act would provide a 25 percent tax credit for businesses that make investments in new rail infrastructure. The tax credit would be available to any shipper or carrier that makes a “qualified” expenditure. Examples of qualifying expenditures for the bill include track, grading, tunnels, signals, certain locomotives, bridges, yards, terminals, and intermodal transfer and transload facilities.

While there is clearly a need for augmenting the ability to fund railroad infrastructure capacity expansion, the railroad industry is also financially responsible for the installation and implementation of the $15 billion Positive Train Control (PTC) mandate, as per the Railroad Safety and Improvement Act of 2008. So, the along with the projected $39 billion shortfall, coupled with the $15 billion for PTC, could lead to a $54 billion gap.

“If you are pressing your Congressman over a concerns about there not being enough money for rail capacity and expansion and PTC and think we should legislatively encourage [Congress] to raise rates, I don’t think that is happening,” said Brooks Bentz, a partner in Accenture’s supply chain practice. It is the opposite. People think rails have monopoly power. I think there may be downward pressure on rates whether it is negotiated or legislated so you have these countervailing forces that are going to impact industry’s need for capacity expansion.”

Bentz added that the White House is also clamoring for increased high speed rail, which requires more capacity expansion to accommodate freight and passenger business, which puts per dollar pressure on rates and a shortfall that can only be funded by public-private investments or private revenue generation. Bentz also noted that one of the appealing measures of the bill is that it provides the potential funding for capacity expansion from private investment as opposed to turning to government coffers.

A Midwestern rail shipper, whom declined to be identified, told LM, that from a short-term perspective, a rail investment tax credit may not generate much in the way of capital spending.

“Nothing I have seen so far provides enough detail on the structure attached to the application of the tax credit that absolutely guarantees it will be spent on capacity expansion and what the definition of that will be versus getting a 25 percent tax credit and [railroads] applying tax credit dollars to a stock buyback to the rails or whatever,” said the shipper. “I am always leery of these credits bc they are not always used for the purposes they are created for.”

As an example, the shipper said that if railroads get a 25 percent tax credit, none of that is passed on to customers. He said if a Class I rail carrier wants to spend $2.5 billion on capital expenditures in 2011, it will build $2.5 billion into pricing structure, rather than $2.5 billion minus a 25 percent tax credit.

“From our perspective we will get improved service depending on where capex is spent,” said the shipper. “And because it won’t necessarily be spent evenly across their network and some benefits could come from expanding facilities and making them more efficient and things of that nature to increase the amount of track capacity one may have within a plant structure so rail cards don’t have to be stored on railroad property and reduce capacity in rail yards which allows more capacity to flow through it.”

Officials at the Association of American Railroads lauded the legislation. AAR President and CEO said in a statement it offers incentives for the country’s highly capital-intensive business and ensures freight rail can continue to meet these expectations.

About the Author

Jeff Berman headshot
Jeff Berman
Group News Editor

Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis. .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

Seasonally-adjusted (SA) for-hire truck tonnage in July headed up 1.3 percent on the heels of a 0.8 percent increase in June. The ATA’s not seasonally-adjusted (NSA) index, which represents the change in tonnage actually hauled by fleets before any seasonal adjustment, was 133.3 in July, which outpaced June’s 132.3 by 0.8 percent, and was up 2.8 percent annually.

Volumes for the month of July at the Port of Long Beach (POLB) and the Port of Los Angeles (POLA) were mixed, according to data recently issued by the ports. Unlike May and June, which saw higher than usual seasonal volumes, due to the West Coast port labor situation, July was down as retailers had completed filling inventories for back-to-school shopping.

With a 0.8 cent decrease, this week’s average price per gallon is $3.835 and stands as the lowest price since hitting $3.844 the week of November 25, 2013.

LTL carriers are rapidly investing in expensive, on-dock, three-dimensional size measurement capturing machinery, and they are hoping one day of being able to more accurately charge shippers rates based on the actual dimensions of their shipments, rather than the traditional weight-and-distance-based formula that has been in effect since the 1930s or even earlier.

The Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) recently reported that its Freight Transportation Services Index (TSI) dipped 0.9 percent from May to June.

Article Topics

News · Accenture · AAR · Freight Rail · All topics

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2013 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA