Warehouse and DC Best Practices: Sephora’s gorgeous network reorganization

Our warehouse/DC engineer dives into the best practices and tools that the retailer put to work in order to expand its distribution network after it became the exclusive provider of beauty products for JCPenney stores.

By ·

When talking “beauty” at Sephora, it clearly isn’t skin deep. As a division of Europe’s premier luxury goods provider Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton (LVMH), this retailer has carved a deep niche in the global beauty market, becoming a major presence in hundreds of retail centers across 24 countries and on the Internet. 

In the U.S. and Canada, Sephora has grown to over 280 stores in a little more than a decade. Its unique open-sell store environment, staffed by a team of beauty experts, provides customers—who the company calls its “clients”—direct access to a broad range of product categories including skincare, color, fragrance, bath & body, smile care, and hair care. Launched in 1999, Sephora.com is now one of the Internet’s foremost beauty shopping sites, making it its largest North American “store” in terms of sales and selection of products and brands.

With such rapid growth over multiple channels, its logistics and supply chain team knew it needed to keep a close watch on its lone 316,000-square-foot distribution center (DC) located in Belcamp, Md. All through 2005, it periodically conducted capacity surveys with Pennsylvania-based supply chain consulting firm St. Onge to determine whether this one-facility distribution operation could continue to support such a high rate of expansion—each time, the facility seemed to hold its own.

But 2006 ushered in a new challenge for the logistics team.

Sephora became the exclusive provider of beauty products for JCPenney stores across the country, offering the same signature Sephora look in hundreds of JCPenney stores, but within a smaller footprint. For the first time, serious doubts were raised on whether the Belcamp DC could support this new marketing push.

In addition, the lease for the DC was about to expire. The team was left sitting with some difficult questions: Was it best to stay in its existing Belcamp facility or should it move to a new, larger building at an optimal site? Should it open a second facility? If so, where should it be and what should its mission be?

Management needed to weigh all of its options and plan the best strategy going forward. To do this, it decided to engage St. Onge in an in-depth network study aiming for a distribution network that could support its expansion while continuing to provide a superior client experience and maintaining a balance of costs. 

To the beauty retailer, the key has always been client satisfaction. “We want to delight our client,” says Martin Flaherty, vice president of logistics for Sephora. “At the same time, we’re also looking at improving profitability, adaptability, and velocity. We want to align our resources to drive success across the enterprise.”

In the span of about 14 weeks, the project team built a model of the new distribution network, tested different scenarios using the latest software, and put together the best solution: a two-facility network with the existing DC in Belcamp and the selection of Salt Lake City as the optimal site for a second facility. 

In June of 2008, Sephora opened its second DC in Salt Lake City, Utah, which has not only relieved the capacity in Belcamp, but also increased its customer service capability by being physically closer to its clients in the western half of the country, reducing its cost per unit shipped.

Over the next few pages we’ll dive into the best practices and tools the Sephora team put to work to transition to a two-facility distribution network that would shrink its order cycle time, getting products to stores quicker and reducing stock-outs. 

click here to download the PDF article
click here to download PDF article

Drawing up the plan
Determining the best strategy required a systematic approach, the analysis of mountains of data using the latest database and network optimization software, the input of experienced team members with first-hand knowledge of the business and its future trends, along with some good, old-fashioned due diligence.

And it all didn’t happen overnight. The first two months were geared towards building a baseline model that mimicked Sephora’s current distribution network, followed by a few weeks of testing different logistics scenarios, culminating with a site-selection period of six months that winnowed the selection to the “perfect” site for the second DC. Here, the Sephora project team shares the steps to their success: 

1. Form an integrated team. First, a project team was assembled. It was led by Flaherty and his internal logistics team and worked closely with St. Onge’s network study team led by Bryan Jensen, vice president for the consulting firm. Input from key personnel from finance, transportation, operations, information systems, and marketing departments was then periodically required to provide the data, establish assumptions, and offer direction for future trends.

2. Understand business issues. The entire team had to understand and agree on how Sephora did business. How did replenishment to stores work? What did the stores need in terms of service? Was there a dollar value associated with having a same day service time to its clients? 

“Internal to the Sephora organization, we needed to make sure we got information, forward-looking expectations, and desires for the operation from the store managers,” explains Jensen. “That determines the boundaries in which the network analysis will examine how they might get their product to the marketplace.”

3. Develop baseline model “as-is network.” Over a four-week period, the team collected data from different areas of the business. Some of this data included a year’s worth of transactional history for its direct-to-consumer (Sephora.com) business and its store business, inbound and outbound freight costs, warehouse operating costs, shipment volumes, and store locations. For most of the preliminary data analysis, St. Onge used SQL query tools that allow the users to manipulate massive data files. 

St. Onge then spent the next four weeks building a baseline model of the existing network. It used leading-edge software specific for distribution network optimization to bring all the above data and assumptions together. The goal was to validate the baseline model by replicating the current distribution network, applying the appropriate transportation costs and volumes, and comparing it against last year’s actual historical costs. The costs determined by the model had to come within a very close one percent. 

4. Establish logistics objectives. After the baseline model was validated, the team began to establish the objectives for the future network. According to Jensen, trying to nail down predictions for Sephora’s future was the most challenging step. The team needed to understand not just the percentage growth in new stores per year, but where they were going to open these new stores as well as the plans for growth of their direct-to-consumer operation.

Would it geographically follow the store patterns and the store population throughout the country? Typically the standard is to look five years ahead, but Sephora also provided St. Onge with a 10-year outlook. “Clearly the further out you look the fuzzier your visions gets,” says Jensen, “but at least you can understand directionally how things will trend beyond a normal five-year horizon. This can be important in a network analysis because implementing the solution can take considerable time.”

5. Identify logistics modeling scenarios. Once growth projections and other future logistics requirements were entered into the model, the team then identified two main scenarios that they wanted to test. Scenario 1: What’s the best East Coast site if Belcamp is closed? Scenario 2: If Belcamp is fixed, what’s our best second site?

For each scenario, the model was populated with statistical data regarding candidate locations. This data includes the average cost per square feet of a DC at that location and all the freight rates to and from that location. The model then rates the candidate sites and ranks them based on the cost to service. 

6. Model scenarios and evaluate. With Scenario 1, the model was run with a clean slate to determine whether or not Belcamp was indeed the optimal site. It turned out that the absolute optimal location was just outside of Philadelphia on the New Jersey side of the Delaware River near Cherry Hill, which is only about 80 miles from Belcamp. “When you’re that close you don’t bother relocating for the amount of transportation costs that would actually be saved,” says Jensen. Management then decided to extend Belcamp’s lease.

In Scenario 2, with Belcamp fixed, the team then re-ran the model with an eye towards optimizing transportation, lead time, and expenses with a second site. “It put us in the general area of Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado, Arizona, and Utah,” says Sephora’s Flaherty. “From there, we reviewed a variety of secondary criteria: the demographics; the cost of doing business such as business licenses, permits, tax credits, incentives from the state; and utility costs.” In the end, Salt Lake and Reno were neck and neck.

7. Prepare an implementation plan. Over six months, Flaherty began the task of implementing this two-DC network solution, personally travelling to both areas, checking out different buildings, and weighing out strengths and weaknesses of each site.

“While both cities looked very promising, Salt Lake City not only optimized our transportation costs, but the local and state governments were very responsive and eager to work closely with us to ensure that our facility was brought online in the shortest amount of time possible,” says Flaherty. He adds how the Salt Lake City’s entire business community never wavered in its support to bring Sephora to the city along with the jobs that it offered the area residents. 

A network with benefits
It’s been three years and Sephora’s two-DC network has significantly improved its customer service cycle time. “Because I’m closer to my stores,” says Flaherty, “I could get replenishment faster, making it less likely to go out of stock on a particular item.” It has also achieved freight economies, while relieving capacity at the Belcamp DC.

Jensen points out another “priceless” advantage with the opening of this second DC. “When you have only one building, it’s a critical point of failure if a fire or a flood devastates it,” says Jensen. “Having two facilities engenders a level of business continuity or additional redundancy to the network.” 

And Sephora continues to grow. “Last year we purchased the largest beauty retailer in Brazil, and we have plans to expand Sephora into that country beginning in 2012,” says Flaherty. “Towards the end of this year, we will be expanding into Mexico.” 

Ever vigilant, the logistics team has just completed another network study to determine the need for a third facility—and so the cycle continues.

click here to download the PDF article
click here to download PDF article

 


About the Author

Maida Napolitano
Maida Napolitano has worked as a Senior Engineer for various consulting companies specializing in supply chain, logistics, and physical distribution since 1990. She’s is the principal author for the following publications: Using Modeling to Solve Warehousing Problems (WERC); Making the Move to Cross Docking (WERC); The Time, Space & Cost Guide to Better Warehouse Design (Distribution Group); and Pick This! A Compendium of Piece-Pick Process Alternatives (WERC). She has worked for clients in the food, health care, retail, chemical, manufacturing and cosmetics industries, primarily in the field of facility layout and planning, simulation, ergonomics, and statistic analysis. She holds BS and MS degrees in Industrial Engineering from the University of the Philippines and the New Jersey Institute of Technology, respectively. She can be reached at [email protected]

Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine!

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Latest Whitepaper
SaaS Supply Chain Management Systems
A guide to better understanding the market, the software and the benefits
Download Today!
From the November 2016 Issue
The third time is the charm for this U.S. manufacturer on the hunt for a third-party logistics (3PL) provider that could successfully combine transportation services and technology capabilities under one roof.
Warehouse & DC Operations Survey: Ready to confront complexity
2016 Quest for Quality Awards Dinner
View More From this Issue
Subscribe to Our Email Newsletter
Sign up today to receive our FREE, weekly email newsletter!
Latest Webcast
Digital Evolution: Streamlining Logistics and Supply Chain Operations
In this FREE virtual conference we'll define the challenges facing operations and offer solutions designed to create dynamic, automated networks that offer seamless communication, improved collaborative third-party relationships, and the ability to respond to changes at a moment's notice.
Register Today!
EDITORS' PICKS
Logistics Management’s Top Logistics News Stories 2016
From mergers and acquisitions to regulation changes, Logistics Management has compiled the most...
Making the TMS Decision: Ariens Finds Just the Right Fit
The third time is the charm for this U.S. manufacturer on the hunt for a third-party logistics (3PL)...

Motor Carrier Regulations Update: Caught in a Trap
The fed is hitting truckers with a barrage of costly regulations in an era of scant profits....
25th Annual Masters of Logistics
Indecision revolving around three complex supply chain elements—transportation, technology and...