YRC Freight kicks off network optimization plan

Less-than-truckload (LTL) transportation services provider YRC Worldwide (YRCW) said today that its network optimization plan for YRC Freight, its largest subsidiary, has officially commenced.

By ·

Less-than-truckload (LTL) transportation services provider YRC Worldwide (YRCW) said today that its network optimization plan for YRC Freight, its largest subsidiary, has officially commenced.

The plan, which was submitted to YRCW’s union leadership in March, was formally approved in late April. Company officials said that this plan will deliver greater service reliability and consistency across their network, coupled with enhancing operational efficiencies by increasing network density, reducing shipment touches, and reducing the number of empty miles.

“Our primary goal is to provide our customers with consistent, reliable, damage-free service,” said Jeff Rogers, president of YRC Freight, in a statement. “The change in operations we are implementing today will give our customers an improved experience when they ship with us.”

According to a copy of the proposed change of operations released by Teamsters for a Democratic Union (TDU), the proposals include:
-consolidating 29 end of line terminals into existing terminal locations;
-reducing end of line road domiciles;
-reducing distribution center locations by 3, utilizing existing capacity to create density for more network direct loading;
-reversing specified road primaries;
-establishing a new relay operation in Staunton, Va. to reduce system miles; and
-adding additional sleeper runs to the Jackson, Miss. road domicile

In an interview with LM, YRCW CEO James Welch said that when he took the reins as CEO in late 2011 YRC Freight had a network that was way too large for the amount of business being done.

“When they put Yellow and Roadway together, in my mind, they did a very poor job of sizing the network for its business levels,” he said at last month’s National Shippers Strategic Council (NASSTRAC) Annual Conference in Orlando. “What we had was a network that was more expensive than it needed to be in which we handled our customer’s freight too much. It was as efficient as it needed to be from a linehaul standpoint. This change does not reduce any of our coverage from a service standpoint. It merely puts us in a better position to improve our density and allows us to load more direct trailers, as an example, which, in turn, gives us the opportunity not to transfer as much of our customer’s freight as we were.”

Welch explained that there is a lot of power and efficiencies to be gained by doing that, coupled with the fact that YRC Freight was able to alter its distribution center network and be configured in a sensible fashion from a density standpoint.

“We think we are going to come out of this on the other side as a better operating company, with our customers being better serviced,” he said.
Following February’s announcement that it had achieved a positive annual operating income in 2012 for the first time in six years, the Overland Park, Kan.-based carrier said in early May it had a positive first quarter operating income—also for the first time in six years. 

YRC’s consolidated operating revenue for the first quarter—at $1.162 billion—was down 2.7 percent compared to the first quarter of 2012. Meanwhile, its consolidated operating income increased from a $48.8 million loss a year ago to a $9.9 million gain in the first quarter, representing a $58.7 million increase. YRC officials said that first quarter operating income included a $4.5 million gain on asset disposals, which included an $8.3 million loss in 2012. And adjusted EBITDA—at $60.7 million—was $45.4 million more than the adjusted $15.3 million recorded a year ago.

First quarter operating revenue at YRC Freight—at $753.8 billion—was down 4.5 percent annually, with total tonnage per day and total shipments per day down 5.4 percent and 5.3 percent, respectively. Revenue per hundredweight and revenue per shipment were up 3.4 percent and 3.2 percent, respectively. First quarter operating income for YRC Freight—at $2.4 million—represented a $58.5 million annual increase and the third straight quarter of positive operating income for the company’s largest segment.

Rogers said on the first quarter earnings call that the company estimates gross annual savings will be between $25-to-$30 million through the plan that he said will eliminate a tremendous amount of fixed costs, with some of the chief benefits being increased network density, fewer shipment touches, and a reduction in empty mileage.

“Our operating improvements are due to a continued focus on getting back to the basics of the Freight business and focusing on business that fits our network and core competencies,” said Rogers. “This focus resulted in an EBITDA margin of 4.5 percent for the first quarter and was mostly due to the 3.4 percent year-over-year increase in our revenue-per-hundredweight and incremental operating improvements. The revenue-per-hundredweight increase is due to concentration in growing higher margin and higher value-added services.”


About the Author

Jeff Berman, Group News Editor
Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis. Contact Jeff Berman

Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine!

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Article Topics

LTL · YRC Freight · YRCW · All Topics
Latest Whitepaper
How Lean is your Lean Quality Program?
Avoid quality program bureaucracy that can sap logistics productivity and increase costs
Download Today!
From the September 2016 Issue
Indecision revolving around three complex supply chain elements—transportation, technology and organizational structure—finds many companies waiting to commit to a strategic path. However, waiting too long will only result in a competitive disadvantage that will be difficult to overcome in today’s fast-paced, global economy.
Time for Asia’s ports to rebuild
Is the freight recession upon us…again?
View More From this Issue
Subscribe to Our Email Newsletter
Sign up today to receive our FREE, weekly email newsletter!
Latest Webcast
Supply Chain Best Practices: Visibility to In-Transit Inventory
During this webcast you'll learn on how various organizations have gained instant access to in-transit parcels and given access to this information to stakeholders.
Register Today!
EDITORS' PICKS
25th Annual Masters of Logistics
Indecision revolving around three complex supply chain elements—transportation, technology and...
2016 Quest for Quality: Winners Take the Spotlight
Which carriers, third-party logistics providers and U.S. ports have crossed the service-excellence...

Regional ports concentrate on growth and connectivity
With the Panama Canal expansion complete, ocean cargo gateways in the Caribbean are investing to...
Digital Reality Check
Just how close are we to the ideal digital supply network? Not as close as we might like to think....