Subscribe to our free, weekly email newsletter!


Moore on Pricing: Truckload pricing and your TMS

By Peter Moore, Partner at Supply Chain Visions
October 01, 2011

It’s become commonplace for shippers to “benchmark” truckload rates with the market either through a consultancy or by accessing one of several web sites with a listing of origin-destination (OD) pairs and a recent market price.

While this is a relatively quick process, and may give shippers a reference point for what you’re paying, it falls well short of what you could do with real “optimization” using a modern, web-accessible transportation management system (TMS) and some smart negotiating.

In the quest to make rate reference tables simple in a TMS, the majority of shippers I’ve worked with often have simple mileage or “flat” line-haul rates for truckload. The only mathematical addition is the fuel surcharge calculation. While this makes loading and retrieving rates easy, it doesn’t leverage the power of a modern TMS—nor does it help shippers to manipulate the many factors that make up the cost of truckload transport in order to save the carrier and the shipper some money. 

The first group of costs, often reflected in carrier rate schedules, includes items such as: minimum charges;  stop-off; detention; and load cancellation. These items are less dynamic and can be negotiated as standards for all loads in a contract period. Be advised that carriers do try to maintain a margin in these accessorial charges, so be sharp about learning the carrier’s labor rates and operating ratio (profitability) so that a fair price is arrived at in advance. 

A second group of costs are more dynamic. They assume that the TMS is interfacing with a sophisticated rate engine with capabilities to deal with transactions as unique events with one-time cost variables. If both the shipper and carrier systems are capable of dealing with unique transaction pricing then several dynamic pricing scenarios emerge. 

First, we look at day-of-shipment “capacity sale” pricing.

A carrier makes available one or more trucks on a given time and day at a sale price.

Conversely, the shipper makes additional freight available in a reverse bid for rates on a given day for a given lane or set of lanes. To make this manageable, the two companies interact at the machine level, and offers and responses are made online via the web. The rate tables for both parties record a new agreed rate that is good for a limited time and for limited usage.

Second, an inbound backhaul is arranged and the Incoterms state that the supplier is covering the cargo through to the destination despite the fact that the receiver is arranging for and paying the carrier. If the load is covered for loss by the supplier, then the shipper should get a break for both the volume of backhaul and the reduction of liability for the carrier.

The third has to do with the problem of over coverage of cargo insurance. Too much insurance often results when a shipper insists on high levels of insurance for all loads when they have a percentage of low-value loads (e.g. return packaging). Often I hear that the shipper’s TMS doesn’t distinguish cargo insurance needs and coverage. 

For more than one carrier the excess in premiums to shippers is a profit maker that they would rather not discuss. For the shipper, savings in this area can cover that new TMS you’ve been thinking about.

Despite the many years the industry has been buying and shipping truckload freight, there is always something new to learn. Keep your people and yourself in learning mode, revise processes to enable more dynamic pricing, and identify and acquire the best TMS technology for moving freight efficiently and effectively.

About the Author

Peter Moore
Partner at Supply Chain Visions

Peter Moore is a partner at Supply Chain Visions, Member of the Program Faculty at the University of Tennessee Center for Executive Education and Adjunct professor at The University of South Carolina Beaufort.  Peter can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)


Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

U.S. Carloads were up 5 percent annually at 294,738, and intermodal at 253,317 containers and trailers was up 3 percent.

When it comes to Congress actually getting its act together on a new long-term federal transportation bill, things remain as status quo as it gets, with the big takeaway being nothing really ever gets done, when it comes to passing a badly overdue and needed bill, rather than these band-aid extensions Congress keeps signing off on.

Truckload and intermodal pricing was up on an annual basis, according to the December edition of the Truckload and Intermodal Cost Indexes from Cass Information Systems and Avondale Partners.

While the official numbers won’t be issued until early February in its quarterly Market Trends & Statistics report, preliminary data for the fourth quarter and full-year 2014 intermodal output from the Intermodal Association of North America (IANA) indicates that annual growth was intact.

Almost all companies today are aware of their labor or material costs... but what about energy consumption? It all comes down to having the energy data needed to determine what actions you must take to improve. The payoff is worth it, as insight into energy data allows you to make more valuable, relevant operating decisions.

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2013 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA