Subscribe to our free, weekly email newsletter!


Eleven critical behaviors for logistics managers

As we turn the corner towards a lasting recovery, we’re reminded of the columns that we wrote in the recent past signaling the shifts in partnerships between shippers and transportation providers—specifically on the rates and services “dance” and potential capacity tension.
By Wayne Bourne
July 01, 2011

As we turn the corner towards a lasting recovery, we’re reminded of the columns that we wrote in the recent past signaling the shifts in partnerships between shippers and transportation providers—specifically on the rates and services “dance” and potential capacity tension.

What we realized a year ago, when the economy started to come back, was that it also beckoned a shift in negotiating power back to the transportation provider. We wrote about the carrier standing fast on their fleet size, and in some cases, right-sizing (reducing) the fleet to more efficiently manage the bottom line. For the most part very little, if any, rolling stock was added to existing fleets, thereby setting capacity at a level consistent with the tendered requirements of the past three “down” years.

My best guess, based on the information I get from the many carriers that I communicate with each month, is that the current average fleet size is equivalent to approximately 82 percent to 84 percent of the levels maintained during the 2006–2008 business years.

So, let’s break it down: An improving economy will produce more load tenders to a collective fleet with trending lower capacity. The notion then becomes that an old-fashioned “Dutch Auction” will take place in the rate negotiations. Thus leading one to conclude that rates will increase substantially or that service may become compromised as some shippers abdicate service for lower rates. Well, it isn’t necessarily so. Good, bilateral partnerships will prevail. Those that worked with their partners during the lean days will be there for each other for the fat days. However, your definition of what constitutes a good partner may differ considerably from how your partner’s.

For some clarity, I asked a group of carriers and shippers to help me prepare a list of shipper behaviors that would be beneficial to the transportation providers in stabilizing costs or even becoming more competitive.

Do not require driver to load or unload freight. The driver has been on the road a long time, his on-duty hours are shrinking, and he needs to be back on the road to pick-up a lane-balancing load. Establish “drop and hook” trailer pools, and remember that load labor increases expenses and reduces productivity for the carrier.

Reduce multi-stop truckloads or the number of stops. These types of loads are very costly from a productivity perspective. Although you may be paying an additional stop-in-transit fee for this service, the carrier tends to loose time and money on each one.

Develop scheduled appointments for live unloads. If you don’t currently have scheduled appointments for your inbound freight or your “live” outbound loads, then you’re creating productivity and expense losses for your carrier. Trucks in cue are hugely unproductive.

Ship SL&C under seal to eliminate the driver count. Let the driver do what he does best. Establish your count, lock it up, and seal it. If the seal is intact at destination, then the driver is off the hook for the count.

Give longer lead times. Give the driver/carrier a little extra time to the delivery appointment. This will accommodate his new log requirements and HOS hassels.

Where and when possible, offer continuous miles. Do you have freight that could be tendered to the driver upon completion of his delivery that would eliminate dead head miles?

Pay your invoices on time. Stay within your agreed payment terms with the carrier. He is your transportation service provider, not your bank.

Do not file frivolous freight claims. Do your internal investigations first and thoroughly. File a claim only when you are convinced that you have incurred a loss.

Do not embellish cargo insurance requirements. Don’t require a carrier to provide you with far more insurance than you will ever encounter in total losses. If the maximum value of a full load is $250,000.00 then don’t require $1,000.000.00. A carrier’s insurance premiums will reflect this practice.

Pay your full fuel surcharges. Don’t stretch out the formulas that determine fuel surcharges.

Respect drivers. Treat these professionals with respect. Provide them with access to rest facilities at your premises. Offer refreshments and communications capabilities to them as well. They are some of the best promoters of your company based on the treatment they receive when they are on the job.

These behaviors are already in place with the shippers that “get it.” But for others, they’re unwittingly creating non-productive expenses for the transportation provider and forcing them to consider adjusting your rates, or even worse, not allocating any available capacity to your use.

About the Author

image
Wayne Bourne

Wayne Bourne is founder and president of The Bourne Management Group, a consulting firm specializing in supply chain, logistics, and transportation network creation, economics, organizational development, and process analysis. A recipient of several industry awards, he has nearly three decades of experience in transportation and logistics management. Mr. Bourne may be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

The Department of Commerce reported that January retail sales were up 0.2 percent compared to December and up 3.7 percent annually at $449.9 billion, and the NRF reported that January retail sales, which exclude automobiles, gas stations, and restaurants, rose 0.6 percent over December and 1.4 percent compared to January 2015.

On the freight shipments side, Cass reported that January shipments––at 1.025––trailed December by 1.3 percent and January 2016 by 0.2 percent. These declines were less than the 4.9 percent drop from November to December, though, and January shipments still topped the 1.0 mark for the 65th straight month in December.

The Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) reported this week that its Freight Transportation Services Index (TSI) saw a 0.4 percent decline from November to December, its second straight decline on the heels of a 1.0 percent decrease from October to November.

Carloads saw a 11.7 percent annual decline at 241,680, and intermodal containers and trailers rose 10.5 percent to 262,830

An amendment to the International Maritime Organization’s Safety of Life at Sea convention will go into effect requiring all shippers (importers and exporters) to certify and submit the Verified Gross Mass – the combined weight of the cargo and the container – to the steamship line and terminal operator in advance of loading the container aboard a vessel.

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2016 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA